Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Granite Studio moved to new, unblocked site

Our new address: http://www.granitestudio.org

One note about blogging software. I actually really like Blogspot/Blogger's software. It's very easy to use and has made writing this blog here very easy. Unfortunately, with the net nanny, it just makes sense to move to our own dedicated site.

This site will remain up for another couple of months so that any links still pointing here remain active, but all new content will be published over at the new site.

Also, please note new feed addresses:

The main feed can be found at:
http://granitestudio.org/feed/

Feedburner feed:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/jottingsfromthegranitestudio

For those of you behind the GFW, we also have a feed on feedsky:
http://feed.feedsky.com/granitestudio

Continued disruptions, sketchy gym memberships and other rants of a random nature

We're still working on getting the new address up and running which means the site will be up and down. Sorry for the disruptions, and we'll have service up and running soon.

It's all due of course to the Net Nanny's continued block on open-source blogging sites.

Does anybody else feel this is the purple elephant pooping in the corner at the Olympic games? The Olympics are supposed to show off for the world how strong, prosperous, harmonious, and wonderful China has become. China is so harmonious and prosperous in fact, that the government feels the need to employ thousands of technicians and purchase millions of dollars of technology to make sure that open discussion of problems and issues is strictly supervised and controlled by government watchdog agencies.

If everything is so happy and shiny and prosperous, what is the government worried about? Why not just let people say what they want? What do they expect is going to happen?

So anyway, the site is set to open again for business very soon. Of course the same cannot be said for my gym. They've been closed since Saturday because of 'electrical problems.' Crusading journalist YJ snooped around and found out from building management and a friendly security guard that...wait for it...the gym hasn't paid their rent or utilities for a couple of months. The 'electrical problem' was that the property management company had shut off their utilities and bolted the doors. The place was still closed as of yesterday.

When YJ went to the gym's office to see what was up, they took her name and phone number so as to "alert us when the gym reopens." Nobody would give her their name, an explanation, the name of an immediate supervisor, the name of a manager, the name of the parent company that ran the gym, or a phone number for any supervisor, manager, or parent company.

The whole thing is exceedingly sketchy and I have a feeling we're about to get screwed with our pants on.

"Take the money and run" is a common response to business setbacks here, so we're trying to organize a posse of fellow gym members to meet with representatives of the gym. Everything's on the table, including the "nuclear option." We'll see.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

More site news

Yeah, the place looks a little ugly right now...but I'll get it cleaned up soon. Also, though if you can read this you probably already know....

the new rss/feed address is: http://www.granitestudio.org/atom.xml

Hope this transition ends soon!

Granite Studio: New Unblocked Site Address

Thanks to Ryan of Dao by Design (A.K.A. The Humanaught), The Granite Studio is now visible behind the Great Firewall.

Set your browsers to http://www.granitestudio.org

The old address still works, too, though obviously not in the PRC:

http://granitestudio.blogspot.com


I'm still working out some of the bugs related to the move, so I appreciate your patience while we get things going.

Moving the Studio

I'm trying to move the blog to a non-blogspot (and unblocked) server this week. There may be some disruptions. If the site suddenly doesn't load, nothing is wrong, we're just messing with addresses. Thank you for your patience and see you on the other side of the GFW.

Monday, January 21, 2008

Martin Luther King, Jr. on China and the War in Vietnam

Today we celebrate Martin Luther King Day in the United States. During his life, Dr. King spoke not just of oppression at home, but also railed against what he saw as American injustices abroad, most notably in Vietnam.

In a speech delivered in New York City on March 4, 1967, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," Dr. King gave a history of the Vietnamese revolution and its relationship to China.

They must see Americans as strange liberators. The Vietnamese people proclaimed their own independence in 1945 after a combined French and Japanese occupation, and before the Communist revolution in China. They were led by Ho Chi Minh. Even though they quoted the American Declaration of Independence in their own document of freedom, we refused to recognize them. Instead, we decided to support France in its reconquest of her former colony.

Our government felt then that the Vietnamese people were not "ready" for independence, and we again fell victim to the deadly Western arrogance that has poisoned the international atmosphere for so long. With that tragic decision we rejected a revolutionary government seeking self-determination, and a government that had been established not by China (for whom the Vietnamese have no great love) but by clearly indigenous forces that included some Communists. For the peasants this new government meant real land reform, one of the most important needs in their lives.

For nine years following 1945 we denied the people of Vietnam the right of independence. For nine years we vigorously supported the French in their abortive effort to recolonize Vietnam."
Not suprisingly given the times, Dr. King's comments sparked considerable controversy. Time Magazine called the speech "demagogic slander that sounded like a script for Radio Hanoi." The extent to which the revolution in Vietnam could be considered "indigenous" was (and still is) hotly debated, and the tropes and cliches heard in this debate were strikingly similar to arguments from a decade earlier regarding China's own revolution. The same logic that asked "Who lost China?" (as if it were ever ours to lose) lived on through the planning of our wars in Southeast Asia and in many ways still resonates in current US policy in Iraq today. It is American exceptionalism at work.

King mentioned China again when he argued that Communism would not fall through war, but through the upholding of democratic values around the world:
War is not the answer. Communism will never be defeated by the use of atomic bombs or nuclear weapons. Let us not join those who shout war and through their misguided passions urge the United States to relinquish its participation in the United Nations. These are days which demand wise restraint and calm reasonableness. We must not call everyone a Communist or an appeaser who advocates the seating of Red China in the United Nations and who recognizes that hate and hysteria are not the final answers to the problem of these turbulent days. We must not engage in a negative anti-communism, but rather in a positive thrust for democracy, realizing that our greatest defense against communism is to take offensive action in behalf of justice. We must with positive action seek to remove those conditions of poverty, insecurity and injustice which are the fertile soil in which the seed of communism grows and develops.
The prescience of this speech seems undeserving of the vitriol which it received. We never did resort to atomic weapons during the Cold War, but hate and hysteria are still the calling cards of those who favor war over peace as a solution to the world's problems. The names of our enemies may have changed, but like a cruel mad lib, the rhetoric remains the same, and Dr. King ends his address on a note that is sadly as relevant today as it was forty years ago:
A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. n the one hand we are called to play the good Samaritan on life's roadside; but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life's highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: "This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say: "This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: "This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo with bruised hands until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood."
Amen.

Voice from China's Past: Guo Songtao on development

This date in 1877, Guo Songtao (郭嵩焘 1818-1891), China's first permanent overseas ambassador, arrived at his new posting in London. Guo was somewhat an odd fit for this role. He was a classically-trained scholar who reacted to his new appointment by remarking, "How can I, who know no foreign language and am ignorant of world affairs, fill my post competently?"

Basically, nobody wanted the gig and Guo drew the shortest straw. As an official, he had developed a reputation for being (a bit too) sympathetic to the foreign invaders, counseling the court in 1858 that steps be taken to avoid, at all costs, a war the Qing could not win, even if it meant appeasing the imperialist powers.

Why send him to London? Well, in 1875 a British adventurer went and got himself killed in Yunnan. The Qing needed to send a 'mission of apology' and it seemed like Guo would be the perfect guy for this somewhat humiliating task. Oh yes, and while he was at it, did Guo mind staying awhile?

He left China in 1876 with a staff of two other officials and a Scottish secretary/advisor. Their ship arrived in London on January 21, 1877 and a week later Guo presented his credentials to Queen Victoria as the head of the Qing Dynasty's first permanent diplomatic mission.

As a diplomat, Guo had a quiet time at the Court of St. James and his tenure was uneventful. But it is not in the realm of diplomacy that Guo is remembered best, instead it is for his candid observations of life in Europe recorded in long journal entries which were subsequently published upon his return to China.

Unfortunately, Guo's musings proved a little too candid. The published journals were banned and the printing blocks confiscated. Conservative scholar-officials savagely criticized Guo for having sullied himself by living among the barbarians and for having the temerity to praise Europeans for having their own 2,000-year history. Guo lived the rest of his days in semi-retirement, writing essays and memorials to whomever would read them urging the establishment of railways, machinery, and other conveniences he had seen while in Europe.

As part of the Voices from China's Past series, here are three excerpts of a letter Ambassador Guo sent from London in 1877:

On England:

Here in England the circumstance of administration, education, and the social customs are changing every day. To trace the whole history of the nation--at first the kind and the people struggled for political power and slaughtered one another. Great confusion lasted for several decades or a hundred years until the time of Zhe-Er-Zhi when the situation became settled. Originally there was no time-honored accumulation of absolute virtue and excellent education [as in China]...

Their attainment of wealth and strength really began only after the Qianlong Period (r. 1736-1795). Steamships were first built at the beginning of the Qianlong period, but at first they were not very profitable. Then in 1801 they began using them in the ocean. The method again followed in the building of locomotives, which had its beginning in 1813. The method was again followed in the building of locomotives in 1813. Thereafter the study of electricity was pursued. Letters and messages were transmitted by a machine of magnetic-iron, until in 1838 a telegraph was first established in their national capital...

From the beginning of England's rise, it has only been several decades; while China was weak and declining they covered a distance of 70,000 li in the blink of an eye...Chinese scholars and officials are presumptuous in their sanctuary and are trying to obstruct the changes of the universe; they can never succeed.
On China:
Personally I think there is something in the minds of the Chinese which is absolutely unintelligible. Among the injuries that Westerners do us there is nothing more serious than opium. Even the British gentlemen feel ashamed of having used this pernicious thing as a pretext for hostilities with China and they are making a strong effort to eradicate it. Yet Chinese scholars and officials are willing to indulge complacently in it, without any sense of remorse.

For several decades it has been the national humiliation. It has exhausted our financial power and injured the lives of our people, but there is not a single person whose conscience is weighed down by it. Now clocks, watches, and toys are owned by all families, and woolen and cotton cloth and the like are prevalent in poor districts and the isolated countryside. The practice in Jiangsu and Zhejiang even goes as far as to put aide the national currency for the exclusive use of foreign bank notes...

Nevertheless as soon as these people heard of the building of railroads and telegraph lines they become solely disturbed and enraged and arose in multitudes to create hindrances and difficulties. There are even people who regard foreign machines as an object of public hatred.
On improving China's transportation and communication infrastructure:
My ideas is that if everything must be done by foreigners it cannot last long. We should make the Chinese thoroughly familiar with their methods. The state of Egypt is in Africa and when she builds railroads she first sends some people to England to study and then build them by imitation.

There is nothing more urgent than to plan earnestly for better domestic administration, in order to lay the foundation of wealth and strength...The area of China is more than 10,000 li. The postal transportation to a distant place takes several tens of days...If the railways and telegraphs are carried through, then 10,000 li will be like the hall or threshold of one's house.
I firmly believe that it is difficult, if not impossible, to objectively view one's own nation or culture without having spent some time someplace else. While Guo, by his own admission, had little knowledge of things foreign, this makes his journals even more interesting. He arrived in England pretty much a blank slate, and whatever gaps he had in his knowledge up to that point, he more than made up for them with his astute observations once he got there.

*********************
Guo Songtao's journals have been translated into English and make fascinating reading, even for non-specialists:

The First Chinese Embassy to the West: The Journals of Kuo Sung-t'ao, Liu Hsi-hong, and Chang Te-yi. Translated and edited by J.D. Frondsham (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974).

The translations of Guo's letter found above are from:
  • China's Response to the West: A Documentary Survey, 1839-1923. Edited by Ssu-yu Teng and John K. Fairbank. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954), pp. 99-102
Other information gleaned in the pages of:
  • Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period, Volume I. Edited by Arthur W. Hummel. (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1943), pp. 438-439
  • Immanuel C.Y. Hsu, The Rise of Modern China, 6th Edition. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p 290.

Monday Must Read: "Liang Qichao and the Strife of Human Races"

Brilliant post by DavesgoneChina on Liang Qichao. Liang's views on society, development, and race were major influences on 20th century Chinese thought and, as Dave ably argues, still play a role in the Chinese worldview.* Run, do not walk, to read.
------------------------
*Not always in a positive way, either: Liang, aping western theorists of the time, famously wrote that brown and black-skinned peoples were morally and intellectually inferior to whites and, presumably, Chinese. Sadly, this racial 'logic' still lingers in the PRC.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Reason number 88 why the Patriots are going to the Super Bowl.

This has nothing to do with Chinese history and everything to do with Boston sports. If you don't care about the latter, then click here to read historian Ken Pomeranz's marvelous post on The China Beat about Han Dynasty reformer/usurper Wang Mang.

Bill Belichick cheated. Fine. He ordered a minion to videotape the opposing team's coaching staff to see if he could decode their signals. Two things. The Barry Bonds defense: Everybody does it, people have a grudge against Belichick and so he was the one they busted. Second, 'Camera-gate' (eyes rolling) had exactly 0.0% to do with the Patriots subsequently going 17-0.* Was it stupid? Absolutely. But Belichick's that kind of guy. He's monomanaically obsessed not only with winning, but supremacy, and for Bill that means having crushed your enemies and made their mothers weep. Think of him as the Khubilai Coach. (Yeah, I know Ghengis would have been better, but the alliteration didn't work, sue me.)

The opposing coach this weekend is Norv Turner. Even if you know nothing of NFL football, all you need to do is read this casino anecdote by ESPN.com columnist Bill Simmons to know everything you need about Coach Turner:

We're eating breakfast (Bish, Hopper, Mike and myself) as Hopper recounts his blackjack experience with Norv Turner -- or as he likes to call it, "My Brush With Non-Greatness":

"Norv was up about two grand," Hopper explains. "Suddenly he scaled down his bets from $100 to $25 and started playing conservatively, like he had taken a pill that turned him into a giant wuss. I couldn't believe it. He stayed on '16' against a (dealer's) face card three times in a 10-minute span. All three times, he screwed me, and I ended up with his crappy card. All three times, the dealer ended up crushing us. And Norv's just sitting there with this dumb smile on his face, counting his hundred-dollar chips. Meanwhile, I'm losing a hundred a hand.

"So after the third time it happened, I leaned back, looked at the ceiling and muttered, 'The coach ... is ... KILLING me ...' Just like that. The coach ... is ... KILLING me. Up until that point, he didn't know that I knew who he was. He stayed for two more hands and bolted. I drove him away."

The mental image of a failed football coach mangling a blackjack table and driving Hopper insane was just too good ... for the next 15 minutes, we couldn't stop talking about it. How could a man get hired to coach an NFL team when he can't even play blackjack? We were flabbergasted by this. For instance, would someone like Mike Shanahan ever stay on "16" when the dealer had a "10" showing? I mean, EVER? Of course not.

"Norv seemed like a nice enough guy," Hopper said, "but there wasn't anything 'coach-like' about him. Can you imagine someone like Parcells just sitting there and taking it while I bitched about him at a blackjack table, right in his face?"

"How many teams has Norv coached?" Mike asked.

"He was an assistant in Dallas and the head coach in Washington," I answered. "In both places, he lost respect of the players pretty quickly."

"I can see why," Hopper sneered.

We started talking about something else. About 10 minutes later, Hopper started shaking his head again. He couldn't stop thinking about Norv.

"If I owned an NFL team," Hopper said, "before I hired a coach, I'd take him to Vegas for a weekend and play blackjack with him. That would tell me everything I needed to know about the guy. Everything."
In homage to Simmons, my personal prediction: Pats 31, Chargers 14 and at least once during the game Belichick calls Tom Brady over to the sidelines and tells him to "sweep the leg."

-------------------------
*Not to jinx anything, but have I mentioned that I'm having The Best. Sports. Year. Ever. The Red Sox won the World Series. The Boston Celtics are the best team in the NBA. The Pats are an unstoppable force for doom. Arsenal has been at or near the top of the table for the entire year AND they have a game in hand over Manchester United. My God, even the Boston Bruins are sucking less than usual. Eventually the sports karma gods will exact their retribution, but for now...I'm liking it.

The history of the PRC according to Ai Wei Wei

In a fascinating interview in the Australian newspaper The Age, Beijing-based artist Ai Wei Wei gives his own take on modern Chinese history:

"It is very important to understand China that you know very soon after 1949, even before the Communists had total control, because of the severity of the problems facing China (what Mao called the 'three mountains' on China's back of feudalism, imperialism and bureaucracy) they developed into a totalitarian state that could not tolerate dissent." He says the party is like the Mafia, its only purpose being to protect and maintain its power.

Ai says the Chinese Communist Party gutted any remaining ideological basis for being.

"The goal of the CCP was to overthrow private property, but every one of the 70 million members of the party today raise their hands at one moment to announce their lives will be sacrificed to end capitalism. This is the biggest lie and if you have 70 million professional liars who are controlling the whole nation … it's a madhouse.

"Why can't you clearly speak out and talk about historical events — what's wrong with you? Why are you (the party) so timid and scared to have debate?"

Ai has become as well-known in China for his controversial statements on the Olympics, politics, and recent events as he has for his art.

One of Ai's most famous pieces also took history as inspiration. "Breaking of Two Kangxi Blue and White Vases," was a performance piece in which Ai broke two antique vases symbolizing the thoughtless destruction of historical artifacts by the Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution.

Good profile and well-worth checking out.

2,500-year old sword found in Jiangxi

From the Shanghai Daily:

CHINESE archaeologists have discovered an elaborately decorated sword, believed to be 2,500 to 2,600 years old, in an ancient tomb in the eastern province of Jiangxi.

"It is reckoned the oldest ever excavated in the country," said Xu Changqing, chief of the excavation team.

A dragon pattern was carved on both ends of the scabbard, he said.
No word yet on when knock-offs of this priceless artifact will be made available for purchase at your local Great Wall souvenir trap store, though I'm guessing we won't have to wait long.

Jeffrey Wasserstrom on the Shanghai Mag-lev Protests

In the wake of last week's protests in Shanghai over construction of a new mag-lev train, historian Jeffrey Wasserstrom has a great piece in The Nation looking at the history of collective action in Shanghai.

It would be a mistake to ignore parallels between the current Shanghai protests and earlier events in the city's history that began with daily-life concerns and calls simply for greater government responsiveness, yet ultimately swelled into broader movements that challenged the legitimacy of an authoritarian ruling party. Protests of this sort took place in the 1940s against the Nationalist government of Chiang Kai-Shek, triggered by hyperinflation. When students of the Tiananmen generation first took to the streets in Shanghai in the mid-1980s, their grievances were largely about the living conditions on campuses but mushroomed into a much more radical set of demands that caught the world's attention in the Beijing Spring of 1989.
A must-read.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Snow in Beijing

One of the best times to walk around Beijing is just after it snows. With a fresh coat of white powder covering the mud, grime, pollution, and concrete, the city almost looks wholesome. The key is, of course, to walk. Beijing motorists--not known for their safety and skill under the best of weather conditions--have a tendency to come completely unglued at the first sign of the white stuff.

Yesterday afternoon I played a little hooky from research to walk around the Houhai area. The lakes are frozen but there are still patches of open water to accommodate resident ducks and the Shichahai chapter of the polar bear club. (Speedos only, dive right in. I'll spare you the photos.) A small crowd of people were milling about the frozen surface of the lake. The ice was pretty solid, though there were definitely spots on the lake that sounded "iffy" underfoot, and that's probably why local officials had posted signs warning people to not go out on the ice. Nobody paid them very much attention, though, including your correspondent.
----------------------
Image: Drum Tower, Beijing, taken January 17, 2008.

Career Option for History Majors #128: Furniture Thief

If you're going to steal things, you might as well grab the good stuff. Last weekend thieves broke into the Grand View Garden near Shanghai and made off with several pieces of expensive furniture, taking only the most valuable rosewood antiques and leaving behind cheaper pieces. This sort of thing takes a certain discerning eye, or at the very least some inside knowledge.

An employee of the garden said the thieves must have been aware of the value of the items as the furniture pieces that had been stolen were all antiques made from rosewood, while other items were relatively new and of little value.

"The ones stolen had been carefully selected," he said. "The big round table which was stolen from the Bamboo Lodge is made from rosewood and of very high quality - some of the items stolen had marble features.

"The table had exquisite workmanship and would fetch a high price."
I've been studying Chinese history for awhile, and God help me, if you put a gun to my head and a pair of vases in my hands--one from the Ming Dynasty and the other a Silk Market knock-off, you might as well go ahead and pull the trigger. Anybody who comes to Beijing looking for 'antiques' and isn't already an expert on the stuff, is jsut asking to be scammed. Glad to know that cat burglars in Shanghai have been doing their homework.

It's worth noting that historically-important pieces are being snatched up by the urban noveau-riche in Beijing and Shanghai, with antique furniture and paintings by famous artists from the imperial era commanding record prices at auction and on the black market.

The pieces stolen all dated from the Ming and Qing dynasties. One staff member at the Garden described the rosewood furniture stolen as "the soul of the garden."

Thursday, January 17, 2008

"Yeah, but OUR inmates aren't tortured!"

One of the most unfortunate side effects of the Bush era is the possibly irreparable damage done to whatever moral authority the US might have once had in discussing human rights around the world. It's a subject that comes up pretty regularly here in Beijing. While I still feel that my Chinese associates who claim that the US human rights record is no better than China's are being either naive or disingenuous, it's true that my rebuttal lacks a certain punch in light of the events of the past few years. Gary Trudeau makes this point rather nicely with today's Doonesbury strip. Enjoy in frustration.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

NFL in China

As a native New Englander, I've been a Pats fan from way back. Yes, even when they were the "Patsies." Now that they have become the New York Yankees of the NFL, I've come to realize how much fun it is to root for the dark side.

So when I heard from my buddy Froog that there was an NFL 2008 party at the Goose and Duck, hosted by the New England Patriots, well....

It was a corporate event. Football toss, raffles, fan clubs, and a replay of last Saturday night's Pats/Jags game. But the real attraction for the mostly male and, surprisingly, mostly Chinese attendees, was an appearance by four of the New England Patriots cheerleaders, who put on quite the halftime show. The curious can check Froog's site for more details and pictures.

I'm still trying to decide where to watch the Superbowl. I could watch it at home on the Slingbox, but I think this requires big screen and other fans. I watched the ALCS at Rickshaw, but I think I may change for the Superbowl. Goose and Duck has the facilities but the new location has all the character of the hotel bar at the Kansas City Ramada Inn and Conference Center. Sammy, of the wonderful dive bar Sunset Grill, has said he will have a "Breakfast with the Superbowl" special that morning. There are other options to consider, fortunately I have two weeks to think about it.